|
|
by
Christopher Vale ©2009 |
 |
|
From
studying the curriculum offered back in the
50's it is clear that Poly's purpose was to convert wild spirits into
technologists. Counting the courses (A, B, and G) and
tallying over four years: there were 33 engineering
classes, including 18 various drawing disciplines; 12 science and 18
practice classes. An ancient colleague styled mathematics as
"the queen of science", and we had a royal array of 28 classes in
math. There were no offerings in biology or in any
life-science.
Of course, you might count physical education and
hygiene as biology. I recall sitting around the gym in our
phys-ed skivvies hearing about the dangers of catching diseases from
girls. They handed out pamphlets which, to me at least, were
incomprehensible at the time.
In the 1890's the school taught anatomy and
physiology. I don't know if the biology gap has been
closed. For me the lack of life-science courses meant I
couldn't tell the difference between etymology and
entomology. Speaking of which, I presume the fishermen in the
Sportsmen's Club knew how to selectively put insects and worms on fish
hooks to catch the desired fish. And the same folks probably
knew how to gut and skin their catch. The Aquaria Club, on
the other hand, studied how to preserve and propagate fish--presumably
inedible. It would have been interesting if the aquarists had
raised trout and bass for the sportsmen.
In addition to the actual curriculum there is
indeed the "something else" effect. That is, if getting a
passing grade depends on working your ass off, and you do, then you
will learn all your biology (or art, or management, or whatever) in
college because you learned how to learn in high school.
That this must be true was demonstrated at the
50th reunion of Class of 56. Some of our classmates are MDs
and others have careers biology related fields. My earning
career didn't require biology. A youthful ideal was to
achieve the engineering in Figure 1; but my actual design
efforts contributed to the useful device of Figure 2. The
closest approach to biology for me is gardening by the trial and error
method. I need more trial and less error.
|

Figure 1 - Steam (woooo-woooo!!!)
|

Figure 2 - Radar (beeep-beeep!!!) |
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
Vale - Poly '56
|
|